<img src="https://trc.taboola.com/1321591/log/3/unip?en=page_view" width="0" height="0" style="display:none">
Fact Check Library

Fact Check with Logically.

Download the Free App Today

Partly_True
partly true

CLAIM ID

d449044c

Eating red meat is unhealthy.

The health impacts of eating red meat continues to be debated in the scientific community. Doctors recommend moderate consumption of red meat.

The health impacts of eating red meat continues to be debated in the scientific community. Doctors recommend moderate consumption of red meat.For years, public health officials have urged Americans to limit the consumption of red meat and processed meats because of concerns that these foods are linked to heart disease, cancer, and other ills. But in Sept. 2019, an international team of researchers conducted five systematic reviews that looked at the effects of red meat and processed meat on multiple health issues, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and premature death. The researchers found “low” evidence that either red meat or processed meat is harmful. They advised that there is no need to reduce red and processed meat intake for health reasons.

In three reviews, the group looked at studies to explore whether red or processed meat increased the risk of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The group reviewed 61 articles reporting on 55 populations, with more than 4 million participants. The researchers also looked at randomized trials linking red meat to cancer and heart disease, as well as 73 articles that examined links between red meat and cancer incidence and mortality. In each study, the scientists concluded that the links between eating red meat and disease and death were small, and the quality of the evidence was low to very low.

Many scientists also questioned the basis for the longstanding dietary guidelines urging people to eat less red meat. “The guidelines are based on papers that presumably say there is evidence for what they say, and there isn’t,” said Dr. Dennis Bier, director of the Children’s Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and past editor of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

David Allison, dean of the Indiana University School of Public Health—Bloomington, cited “a difference between a decision to act and making a scientific conclusion.”

The American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and other groups have fiercely criticized the study. “This new red meat and processed meat recommendation was based on flawed methodology and a misinterpretation of nutritional evidence,” says Dr. Frank Hu, chair of the Department of Nutrition. “The authors used a method often applied to randomized clinical trials for drugs and devices, which is typically not feasible in nutritional studies.”

Organizations like the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, the World Health Organization, or the World Cancer Research Fund International recommend eating meat in “moderation,” based on many studies that have found heavy meat consumption to be associated with premature death, various cancers, heart disease, and diabetes.

Have a question or correction on one of our fact-checks?

If you think a claim has been misjudged or requires correction, please send us evidence to support your error claim. We will revisit our evidence and verdict and conduct additional research to verify new information.

Fact Check of the Day

misleading

397 children were diagnosed with heart inflammation after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine in U.S.