<img src="https://trc.taboola.com/1321591/log/3/unip?en=page_view" width="0" height="0" style="display:none">
Fact Check Library

Fact Check with Logically.

Download the Free App Today

true
true

CLAIM ID

812c7bf8

U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether police can enter a person's home without a warrant to seize his guns.

The Court would determine if the 'community caretaking exception' to the Fourth Amendment would apply to a person’s residence as well as to their car.

The Court would determine if the 'community caretaking exception' to the Fourth Amendment would apply to a person’s residence as well as to their car.The Fourth Amendment right mandates producing a warrant showing probable ground before a person's house is searched by the police. However, there are some exceptions to these rights, like exigent circumstances, emergency aid, and the community caretaking exception.

The community caretaking exception allows the police to search without a warrant to seize evidence while performing community caretaker function. This could also include caretaking activities performed by officers that are "totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute." However, the application of this exception is being debated.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit in 2020 upheld the police officer's actions under the community caretaking exception to the Fourth Amendment in the case Caniglia v. Strom. In 2015, Edward Caniglia and his wife Kim Caniglia had a heated discussion at their home in Cranston, Rhode Island. During which Mr. Caniglia retrieved an unloaded handgun in a "dramatic gesture," which alarmed his wife. Mrs. Caniglia spent the night in a hotel and the next morning called her husband to check on him. Failing to get in touch with him, she called the Cranston Police Department, requesting them to check on her husband and escort her back home. She even told the officers about the gun she hid before leaving and how she was worried about her husband taking his own life. Owing to the circumstances, the officers sent Mr. Caniglia to the hospital to check on his mental health and searched his home without obtaining a warrant. The police seized two guns from the couple's home. Mr. Caniglia sued the department for violating his Fourth Amendment right to privacy and his Second Amendment right to keep handguns in the home for self-protection. After losing the case in the lower court, Mr. Caniglia appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which the court agreed to hear on March 24, 2021.

The Supreme Court will now decide on extending the community caretaking exception to warrantless searches of the home, or would it account to police having bypassed the Fourth Amendment's restrictions.

Have a question or correction on one of our fact-checks?

If you think a claim has been misjudged or requires correction, please send us evidence to support your error claim. We will revisit our evidence and verdict and conduct additional research to verify new information.

Fact Check of the Day

misleading

397 children were diagnosed with heart inflammation after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine in U.S.